Censoring The Media Essays On Music - Essay for you

Essay for you

Censoring The Media Essays On Music

Rating: 4.8/5.0 (27 Votes)

Category: Essay

Description

The Censorship of Music - Essay

The Censorship of Music
  • Music Censorship III Cause and Effect Essay: MusicCensorship Abstract: This cause and effect essay analyzes the lyrical content of popular.
  • Music Censorship: a Violation of Artistic Expression MusicCensorship . A Violation of Artistic Expression Brandi Yaeger University of Phoenix What if you were told that you could no.
  • Music Censorship Censorship in Music When listening to the radio, most people come across a song that has been changed from its original version.
  • Music Censorship Should Music be Censored? Once people hear about the United States they automatically relate the country to the word "freedom." Little do they.
The Censorship of Music

The Censorship of Music:
It’s our Right
In 1967, The Doors agreed to appear on the Ed Sullivan Show; executive producers asked that the word “higher” be removed and replaced with “better” from their hit song, “Light my Fire”. The exact lyrics are “You know that it would be untrue. You know that I would be a liar ,If I was to say to you ,Girl, we couldn't get much higher, Come on baby, light my fire, Come on baby, light my fire, Try to set the night on fire”. This is a key example of censorship at work. Some say that music has been censored since the 1900’s. Some other prominent musicians that have been censored are Dixie Chicks, Madonna and Eminem (Free Muse). The people that are trying to censor music are religious extremists, presidential candidates and, government officials. These groups say that certain music contains anti-Christians themes, profanity, sex and violence. They censor the music by restricting or eliminating radio play, boycotts and protests (Dority). I believe that censorship of music in the United States is wrong. It is wrong because it is a violation of our freedom of speech; it limits the amount of artistic expression an artist can have and gets in the way of breaking down barriers which might not be touched any other way.
When you think of artistic expression, music probably is not the first thing that comes to mind. Most people think of painters or poets, but music is no exception. To censor music is in fact attempting to eliminate our artistic expression. In fact, musicians sometimes even censor their own work to avoid being singled out or rejected by groups (Dority). This reason alone is reason enough to stop the censoring of music. As Victor Lombardi’s states in his thesis paper titled, “Music and Censorship”, “Once an artist, an individual produces art, something that may be thought of as a commodity. A censor who seeks to limit the distribution of this commodity not only harms the artist economically, but also professionally.

View Full Essay

Other articles

Media Censorship Of Music Essay Research Paper

Any journalist who completes college in journalism is taught the Journalists Code of Ethics. Journalists are taught these ethics to insure that all journalists will act in a professional and ethical manner. Yet the media violates these codes when they censor music for any reason other than profanity. The first of these codes states: they are taught to support the open exchange of views, even views they find repugnant (Society). This is perhaps the most important code that journalists are to follow. They are in direct violation of this code when they cave into pressure from the government and religious groups to censor music. The second of these codes states: they are to examine their own cultural values and avoid imposing those values on others (Society). Whether it is changing the lyrics to a song or the total banning of a song, unless the song being censored contains profanity, they have an ethical duty not to let their values influence what music they play. The third and final code that applies to this issue states: they are to expose unethical practices of journalists and the news media (Society). This code is violated because the journalists who work at these stations, that censor music, go along with what they are told. These journalists have an ethical responsibility to expose any unethical practices their station may have. To further understand how censorship applies to unethical practices of the media we need to first understand the true definition of the word censor.

The word censor has a very specific meaning. If you look in a dictionary the word censor means: to examine for fitness and often delete parts deemed unsuitable (Morehead, 118). In the United States we often think of censorship as the total banning of something. Similar to how the Nazi’s used to burn books in Germany. Censorship in the United States is for the most part exactly how its true definition is stated. The media has determined what music is suitable and what is unsuitable and they have deleted parts they disagree with. Many people feel that if the media is allowed to censor music then it must be okay because our First Amendment rights protect our freedom of speech.

After the United States won the Revolutionary War our founding fathers wr

The Ethics of the Media

The essays are ideal for those taking examinations in English Literature.

The Ethics of the Media

The purpose of the media has become an ongoing question since the large amount of conflicts between the consumer and media. Why is the original purpose of the media so damn hard to figure out? It is time to confront this issue instead of blowing it off by saying, "We can never change the media, so why bother?" What kind of chickenshit statement is that. If there are so many people with so much power, surely one of them realizes the downward spiral of the ethics of the media. I feel my sole purpose of this paper is to tell everyone my ideas and viewpoints on censoring the media.

Ooooooo, censor. What a bad word that is when used in the same sentence with media. So many people believe censorship is a bad thing, but there is no other solution in stopping the "bad press." When I sit back and look at the stories about stories that are bad and offending to someone, I realize something needs to be done. The media is out of control. True, there are many informing and needed stories, but, my god, how many times a day to we need to hear and read about how much money O. J. Simpson has to pay the family of Ronald Goldman? We, as consumers, need to sit back and ask ourselves, "What was the point of hearing or reading that story?" Back to the censor issue. I, as an aspiring journalist, do not believe in total and complete censorship of the media, but also, as an aspiring journalist, I am embarrassed of some of the stories that are run, for instance, when the crime scene photos of Jon-Benet Ramsey were run in Globe magazine. Was there not anyone, an editor, a writer, or even a custodian at Globe who thought, "Uh, oh. These photos may get us into some trouble." Was there not a single sole who had enough ethics to try and stop these pictures from being printed? This is where censorship comes in. If I could do anything in the world, I would first, stop world hunger, and second set up some guidelines and laws that the media must obey.

Guidelines such as, no digging through peoples trash and no peeking in windows. Of course, we know that by law, there is to be no peeking in windows, or over fences, but there is no one at the editors desk to implicate these laws. There is supposed to be someone there to prevent these stories from running, but remember, their paycheck depends on how many copies are sold or how high the ratings are. This "censor person" needs to have a set wage. If there was someone to stop these types of occurrences, half of my problems with the media would be taken care of. This may sound like a lame solution, but we need to start somewhere.

Obviously this is not a complete solution to these problems with the media, so the next step would be to start using the editors for weeding out the stories that are not giving some type of information that the consumer wants and needs to hear or read. This is also easier said than done. This solution also brings up questions like, how does the editor know what stories the consumer wants to hear or read about? That is the responsibility of the media. Let them take polls and give every effort to find out what we want. Journalism will only survive if it establishes a more valuable and clearly defined mission, (Morality of Mass Media, Ellen Hume.)

I could write a book about all the things I want to see changed in the media before I become a part of it, but I will not. There should be a line drawn so that the media can be punished for their wrongdoing. Many people agree that there should be a line drawn and like it or not, that line is called censorship. Our founding fathers did not want censorship on the media, but they probably did not think that the media would be doing such a crummy job. I do not want to say that all media is doing a bad job. Overall, they are doing a fairly good job, but there is still a large amount of dirty press that needs to be cleaned up.

Please do not pass this sample essay as your own, otherwise you will be accused of plagiarism. Our writers can write any custom essay for you!

  • How free is too free Today, in the 1990's, citizens in our society are being bombarded with obscene material from every direction. From the hate lyrics of Gun's 'N Roses to the satanic lyrics of Montley Crue and Marilyn Manson to the sexually explicit graphical content of today's movies, the issue is how much society is going to permit and
  • Creative Alternatives to the Issues of Censorship News flash: A 12 year old kills a 6 year old by practicing wrestling moves on her he learned from WWF Smack Down. A 13-year old boy shoots and kills a classmate with a gun he ordered from the Internet. As we can see in these disturbing incidents, violence amongst youngsters is on the rise.
  • Media And The Public Sample essay topic, essay writing: Media And The Public - 1040 words When radio became popular around the forties and fifties, it was the one source of entertainment and news that people could enjoy in the comfort of their own home. In "Radio Days", radio was a central part of the lives of the movie's characters,
  • Freedom or Suppression? Government censorship can be looked at as a blessing or an unneeded burden. I personally feel that all censorship is completely unnecessary and should be found unconstitutional. It is the countless moral views that bring no right answer for what should and should not be censored. I know that the governments version of censorship varies
  • What Happened To Our Rights? « Censorship in America today has gotten way out of hand. « There always seems to be some holier than thou group speaking out as if they were representing the majority of Americans. « These groups want to censor just about anything and everything we do. « When it comes to watching television, reading a

31 August 2014. Author: Criticism

Censorship Of Music In The Media - School Essays

Censorship Of Music In The Media


Censorship of Music in the Media
The American society of today has buried its head in the sand. If our venerable representatives in Washington, D.C. and our respective state capitols feel the need to regulate which musical albums and concerts I should be exposed to, then I guess that means I will have to find someone to vote for who doesn't feel that way; because those Lexus' and those mansions are harder to come by without taxpayers' money for a salary. In fact, repeated attempts to censor my music selection, not to mention my movies and my books, might result in my own name appearing on the ballot someday.
The first amendment represents a profound national commitment to uninhibited.

Want to read the rest of this paper?
Join Essayworld today to view this entire essay
and over 50,000 other term papers

the most sensitive among us. Thus, the general rule remains that so long as the means are peaceful, the communication need not meet standards of acceptability.
Some advocates of government action to restrict access to music have called certain music obscene and suggested that this might permit federal regulation. Such suggestions cannot be reconciled with First Amendment jurisprudence. Obscenity, which the Court has said is largely outside the boundaries of First Amendment protection, it is a very narrow and circumscribed area of communication. Being that obesity is easily confused with protected sexual expression. Supreme Court has asked that lyrics be specified as to their obscenity content, or discount certain messages. In the street, the Supreme Court noted that speech that is neither obscene as to youths nor subject to some other legitimate prescription cannot be suppressed solely to protect the young from ideas or images that a legislative body thinks unsuitable them.
Music.

Get instant access to over 50,000 essays.
Write better papers. Get better grades.

national organization exclusively dedicated to promoting the First Amendment as applied to the support, presentation, and creation of arts in our culture. Now they are fighting against Senator Sam Brownback.

The NCFE's Petition

We oppose censorship in any form. There are those, particularly in public office, who would presume to dictate what music is good or bad, appropriate or inappropriate and what is ultimately worthy of being created; all the while claiming not to be censors. We see this for what it is and are lending our names and voices to a core American value; freedom of expression. Singling out and attacking specific artists for the lyrical content of their recordings that some.

Succeed in your coursework without stepping into a library.
Get access to a growing library of notes, book reports,
and research papers in 2 minutes or less.

Censorship Of Music In The Media. (2007, October 3). Retrieved August 7, 2016, from http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Censorship-Of-Music-In-The-Media/72156

"Censorship Of Music In The Media." Essayworld.com. Essayworld.com, 3 Oct. 2007. Web. 7 Aug. 2016. <http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Censorship-Of-Music-In-The-Media/72156>

"Censorship Of Music In The Media." Essayworld.com. October 3, 2007. Accessed August 7, 2016. http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Censorship-Of-Music-In-The-Media/72156.

"Censorship Of Music In The Media." Essayworld.com. October 3, 2007. Accessed August 7, 2016. http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Censorship-Of-Music-In-The-Media/72156.

Censorship In Music Essay

Censorship In Music Essay

This essay has a total of 1074 words and 7 pages.

Censorship In Music

Matchmaker.com: Sign up now for a free trial. Date Smarter!

Censorship In Music

Censorship in music is a topic that has
brought about much controversy in the past two decades. There have been
many different arguments on the topic, however the question still remains
as if it should be censored or it should not be censored.

Before you can form an opinion on this,
you must hear both sides of the argument on this much-debated topic. Some
people believe that music should be censored so all audiences can hear
it without it containing any controversial lyrics. Others believe it should
not be censored and musical artists should be able to speak, sing, rap,
or rhyme freely without anyone censoring them.

"Whether a person finds a work obscene
depends largely on his or her moral or religious beliefs. These views change
with each generation and further complicate the censorship dilemma." (Censorship
by, Bradley Steffens page 97)

The quote above is very true. Religious
or moral beliefs have a great influence on how a person feels about censorship,
and as generations pass on the common beliefs on it may change. Right now,

America is more uncensored than ever. However, things were very different
a few generations ago.

Some people believe music should be censored.

They believe some of the language musical artists use is vulgar, obscene,
and crude. Also the fact that music is played on medias such as radio and
television, which are free to listen to by all audiences, and there are
many parents that would not wish for their kids to hear foul language.

So on radio and televison any controversial language is either silenced,
edited out by a soft sound, or some artists make two versions of their
songs; one that is made for the artist's album, which is uncensored; and
one for televsion and radio with any controversial words change to be acceptable
for all audiences. This does not include cable television, which can be
audited by parents since the parents must order and pay for the channel
to be viewed.

"Preventing or punishing speech. is a clear
violation of the First Amendment."
(Censorship. Opposing Viewpoints by, Greehaven

Press page 147). This quote here is the "battle cry" of many anti-censorship
groups. When you really think about it, it is a violation of the First

Amendment, which says: "Congress shall make no law. abridging the freedom
of speech or of the press". The First Amendment guarantees the right to
freedom of speech, and censorship is violating peoples' rights to say whatever
they want to say. It is sometimes difficult to understand when a child
gets punished for using foul language meanwhile the child's parents have
the right to critiscize and petition the government whenever they feel
the need to do so. Many musical artists feel that when they are forced
to change lyrics their rights are being violated. In some artists' songs
they like to express their feelings towards somebody or something, and
it hurts them to be censored because the new words implemented are not
from his or her heart. They feel that they are being held down.

Due to the amendment made by our founding
fathers I do not believe there will ever be an answer to the question whether
or not music should be censored. The way I see it, it should not be censored.

Continues for 4 more pages >>

Censoring the media essays on music

censorship/ Media Censorship Of Music term paper 7119

Disclaimer: Free essays on censorship posted on this site were donated by anonymous users and are provided for informational use only. The free censorship research paper (Media Censorship Of Music essay ) presented on this page should not be viewed as a sample of our on-line writing service. If you need fresh and competent research / writing on censorship, use the professional writing service offered by our company.

Any journalist who completes college in journalism is taught the Journalists Code of Ethics. Journalists are taught these ethics to insure that all journalists will act in a professional and ethical manner. Yet the media violates these codes when they censor music for any reason other than profanity. The first of these codes states: they are taught to support the open exchange of views, even views they find repugnant (Society). This is perhaps the most important code that journalists are to follow. They are in direct violation of this code when they cave into pressure from the government and religious groups to censor music. The second of these codes states: they are to examine their own cultural values and avoid imposing those values on others (Society). Whether it is changing the lyrics to a song or the total banning of a song, unless the song being censored contains profanity, they have an ethical duty not to let their values influence what music they play. The third and final code that applies to this issue states: they are to expose unethical practices of journalists and the news media (Society). This code is violated because the journalists who work at these stations, that censor music, go along with what they are told. These journalists have an ethical responsibility to expose any unethical practices their station may have. To further understand how censorship applies to unethical practices of the media we need to first understand the true definition of the word censor.

The word censor has a very specific meaning. If you look in a dictionary the word censor means: to examine for fitness and often delete parts deemed unsuitable (Morehead, 118). In the United States we often think of censorship as the total banning of something. Similar to how the Nazi’s used to burn books in Germany. Censorship in the United States is for the most part exactly how its true definition is stated. The media has determined what music is suitable and what is unsuitable and they have deleted parts they disagree with. Many people feel that if the media is allowed to censor music then it must be okay because our First Amendment rights protect our freedom of speech.

After the United States won the Revolutionary War our founding fathers wr

Here you can easily hire a private writer in as early as 5 minutes. With 200+ writers available 24/7. we can help with any written assignment (from simple essays to dissertations).
Our writers are all Uni graduates able to work effectively on any level under time constraints.
Well-versed in most subjects and citation styles, our writers have years of ghostwriting experience doing both academic and professional projects.

Placing an order is a snap. You enter your details and deadline and get a personal writer who works with you on a one-to-one personal level until you are happy with the finished product.
Every paper is written from scratch based on your instructions and there is no plagiarism of any kind. Plus, we guarantee free unlimited revisions.
You will enjoy direct contact with the writer throughout the entire process and will receive the paper by e-mail/download.

All content will be 100% original and there will be no plagiarism. Any outside info will be properly cited.
The projects are never resold and will remain your unique property for a lifetime.
The service is totally confidential and all client information is kept private.
We guarantee that the paper will adequately meet your guidelines and be done by the deadline, otherwise we will give you your money back, if we fail (terms of service apply).

  • 10+ years of experience in paper writing
  • Any assignment on any level. Any deadline!
  • Open 24/7 Your essay will be done on time!
  • 200+ essay writers. Live Chat. Great support
  • No Plagiarism. Satisfaction. Confidentiality.

Censorship in Music Essay

Censorship in Music Essay

This essay has a total of 1255 words and 6 pages.

Censorship in Music


Censorship in music is a topic that has brought much controversy in the past two decades.
There have been many different arguments on the topic, however the question still remains
as if music should be censored or not. I think that music should not be censored for one
solid reason: artist must reveal and express their feeling however they see it fit, that�s
why we call them artists.


Before we can form an opinion on this much-debated topic, we must hear both sides of the
argument. Some people believe that music should be censored so all audiences can listen to
it without it containing any controversial lyrics. Others believe it should not be
censored and musical artists should be able to speak, sing, rap, or rhyme freely without
anyone censoring them.


"Whether a person finds a work obscene depends largely on his or her moral or religious
beliefs. These views change with each generation and further complicate the censorship
dilemma." (Censorship by, Bradley Steffens page 97)

The quote above is very true. Religious or moral beliefs have a great influence on how a
person feels about censorship. As generations pass on, the common beliefs may change.

Right now, America is more uncensored than ever. However, things were very different a few
generations ago. The freedom of speech was limited, and parents couldn�t make money off of
record companies by suing them.


If people believe that some of the language musical artists use is vulgar, obscene, and
crude, they should not listen to it. Music that is played on media such as radio and
television-which is free to listen to by all audiences- is either silenced, or edited.
Some artists even make two versions of one song: censored and uncensored. I think parents
that would not wish for their kids to hear foul language should be happy about that fact.
This does not include cable television, which can be audited by parents, since the parents
must order and pay for the channel to be viewed.


"Preventing or punishing speech�is a clear violation of the First Amendment."
(Censorship. Opposing viewpoints by, Greehaven Press page 147). This quote here is the
"battle cry" of many anti-censorship groups. When you really think about it, it is a
violation of the First Amendment, which says: "Congress shall make no law� abridging the
freedom of speech or of the press". The First Amendment guarantees the right to freedom of
speech, and censorship is violating peoples' rights to say whatever they want. It is
sometimes difficult to understand when a child gets punished for using foul language,
meanwhile the child's parents have the right to criticize and petition the government

whenever they feel the need to do so. Many musical artists feel that when they are forced
to change lyrics, their rights are being violated. In some artists' songs they like to
express their feelings towards somebody or something, and it hurts them to be censored
because, the new words implemented are not from his or her heart. They feel that they are
being held down.

Many children often hear explicit language from older siblings or parents at an early age.
They believe that since someone they look up to uses those words, they should too.
Eventually, everyone will be exposed to language they do not find acceptable. �Now I would
fight about that�. The key element in children�s life is their parent, who must, from an
early age of the child teach him/her what�s right and what�s wrong. It is not the artist�s
fault that kids� hear foul language, and repeat it elsewhere. It is the parent�s fault. 98
percent of all parents that complain about foul language in the music, are the once that
don�t spend enough time with their children; therefore don�t influence them as much as
needed. Schools and babysitters are not the solution, but if that�s the only choice, well
parents should have thought about it before having kids.

Continues for 3 more pages >>

Essay on Music of Censorship

Music of Censorship
  1. Music Censorship All types of music need some kind of censorship. Censorship makes a person realize that music is good for the heart. Censorship totally makes people.
  2. Music Censorship of the controversial music will not resolve any problems and it will only create more problems. The current state of society would not allow music censorship to be.
  3. Music Censorship to musical works is banned. This censorship may come from a series of motivations such as moral, political, religious, or obscenity reasons. Music censorship first.
  4. Music Censorship always remain. Music censorship may stem from race, fear, and morality just to name a few sources of censorship. I believe even though music censorship didnt always.
  5. Censorship Another problem that plagues today's youth is the music industry. Censorship is a major problem in the music industry because of the Charter of Rights in Canada.

Date Submitted: 01/28/2010 01:29 AM Flesch-Kincaid Score: 74.6 Words: 346 Essay Grade: no grades Flag

Have you ever wondered why people censor music Artists? It seems that music is getting more censored than it should. They censor music because it has bad words, but it’s not right to do it because it messes up their lyrics.

Censorship means that the government censor words on TV and music are not for children. On the internet it says that it is sometimes bad to censor and sometimes good. Artists are getting madder and madder everyday. They are blocking the Artists art and people who are listening to this music are fighting to get this music uncensored.

Censorship is bad because it talks away right of speech in the first amendment. So if they are doing censorship it should be illegal because of the right of speech. They always censor music it probably makes you as mad as it mad. I read an article in the internet about why they censor music-because the children who listen to it, try to do what the lyrics say. That’s not true most teens do the opposite.

The third reason censorship is wrong is the government should censor the music and let parents choose what they want the children to watch and what they want not to watch. If the parents don’t want the child to watch the music, it should be banned to the child and no music has to be censored. This is a better way not problems will occur and everybody will be all right. ‘As such there are no laws concerning the censorship of music. Songs which have strong language or racist or harmful references will have this sign on them:

This simply means that anyone can buy the song but they should be aware of what the song contains. There have been many songs that have been banned by radio stations and TV stations across the world.’

In conclusion they should not censor music. They are censoring the Artists art. It is in the 1st admendment and they should let the parents choose.

Comments