The Unexamined Life Is Not Worth Living Meaning Essay In Spanish - Essay for you

Essay for you

The Unexamined Life Is Not Worth Living Meaning Essay In Spanish

Rating: 4.5/5.0 (15 Votes)

Category: Essay

Description

The unexamined life is not worth living - Philosophy Stack Exchange

This answer isn't actually mine, it's from an article on NewPhilosopher. I will paraphrase the article but all credit should go to the author of said article.

We should start by recognising the obvious, that the claim is addressed to those who satisfy the quality of "being human". For Socrates, a human being should have the ability to eclipse basic desire in order to make conscious, ethical choices. However, this is not denying that basic desire, instinct etc. have the ability to shape our behaviour.

For instance, you may think it highly unlikely that a lion would spare its prey out of concern for its nearby children. For humans, we don't always need a visible "accusing hand" in order to stop us doing something. Oftentimes, we hold a simple belief that something is "wrong" because we just feel that it is wrong.

Now, let's get onto the "unexamined life" part which we will take to mean:

Those who do not examine their lives (make conscious ethical decisions) fail to live a life that allows them to experience being fully human.

Under the previous definition of "being human", those who fall prey to the allure of answers which allow them to follow custom and set aside contemplation- are possibly living an unexamined life.

An unexamined life of the above sort would be quite pleasant, where one can live a "conventional" rather than ethically examined, life.

Other articles

Socrates unexamined life essay - more than 7, 000 students trust us to do their work

Free unexamined life papers, essays. Truth Be Told Socrates' Examinations of Life - Socrates once said, “The unexamined life is not worth living.”

Socrates' Unexamined Life Essays Over 180,000 Socrates' Unexamined Life Essays, Socrates' Unexamined Life Term Papers, Socrates' Unexamined Life Research Paper, Book.

Free College Essay The Unexamined Life Is Not Worth Living. Socrates was considered by many to be the wisest man in ancient Greece. While he was eventually condemned.

Here given is a custom written essay example, explaining why the unexamined life is not worth living. Feel free to use this proofread paper night and day.

The Unexamined Life Essays Over 180,000 The Unexamined Life Essays, The Unexamined Life Term Papers, The Unexamined Life Research Paper, Book Reports. 184 990 ESSAYS.

Why does Socrates think that the unexamined life is not worth living? Does he have a good defense of his philosophical life? As the wisest man in all of ancient.

Socrates, the father of ancient philosophy, once stated, "An unexamined life is not worth living" in The Trial and Death of Socrate. In order to

socrates unexamined life essay Related Articles

Socrates: The unexamined life is not worth living - Conscious Earth - Connecting the Personal and Planetary

By Robert Gerzon

I've always been fascinated by Socrates' bold statement that "The unexamined life is not worth living."

He doesn't mince words. He doesn't say that the unexamined life is "less meaningful than it could be" or "one of many possible responses to human existence." He simply and clearly says it's not even worth living.

Why does he make such strong, unequivocal statement?

Socrates believed that the purpose of human life was personal and spiritual growth. We are unable to grow toward greater understanding of our true nature unless we take the time to examine and reflect upon our life. As another philosopher, Santayana, observed, "He who does not remember the past is condemned to repeat it."

Examining our life reveals patterns of behavior. Deeper contemplation yields understanding of the subconscious programming, the powerful mental software that runs our life. Unless we become aware of these patterns, much of our life is unconscious repetition.

As a psychotherapist, I see so many tragic examples of the effect of an unexamined life. I remember Melissa, a sensitive, attractive woman in her late forties who realized that a series of repetitive, doomed-from-the-beginning relationships had used up so many years of her life that it was now very unlikely that she could still manifest her dream of a husband and children of her own. I recall Donald, a caring, hard-working man who neglected his wife and family emotionally for too many years. By the time he came to see me he was divorced, depressed and living alone in an apartment.

If only Melissa and Donald had taken the time to examine and reflect upon their lives as they were living them, they could have made changes and had a different experience during their lifetime.

The good news is that it is never too late to start examining our life more thoroughly -- and to reap the rewards. Melissa never had the child she wanted but she stopped recreating her past and eventually married a loving man who helped her heal her childhood wound of a father who deserted her. It was too late for Donald to get a second chance with his wife, but he was able to build strong relationships with his children.

We all have blind spots. Sometimes when I examine a chronic problem in my life, I have that unsettling feeling that I must be missing something, but I can't quite see what it is. We try to examine ourselves, but none of us can see our own back side (our "shadow").

That's why Socrates' method of self-examination included an essential element that became known as "Socratic" dialogue. Dialoguing with a close friend, a spouse, a skilled psychotherapist or spiritual adviser helps reveal those blind spots we cannot see by ourselves.

Our society discourages self-awareness with a weekly cycle of working and consuming that keeps us too busy to slow down for self-reflection. Consumer capitalism's game plan prefers an unaware and vaguely dissatisfied populace that tries to fill the emptiness inside with shiny new products.

It's a radical act to stop and contemplate your life. But according to Socrates, it's the only game that really matters.


Find out more about how Life Coaching can help you examine your life.

Find, The Unexamined Life Is Not Worth Living Meaning

The Unexamined Life Is Not Worth Living Meaning


The unexamined life is not worth living. —Socrates In our modern, materialistic, media-saturated society, few people take the time to ponder the questions of. What does Socrates mean by “The unexamined life is not worthy of a human being” [or, “is not worth living”]. When you live your life with purpose, you’re giving your life meaning. Its not totally complete, but that does not mean the intermediate steps did not. Thus, the question h An Unexamined life is not worth living - essay. Thus, the question h An Unexamined life is not worth living - essay What exactly is the meaning of Socrates?s maxim.

Query: refuting Socrates’ an unexamined life is not worth living. The? “the unexamined life is not worth living”-what does? “The unexamined life is not worth living” Socrates? “Know Thyself” and “The unexamined life is not worth living” Spring 1996. According to Socrates the ‘unexamined life is not worth living’ what did he mean. Socrates, in Plato, Dialogues, Apology Greek philosopher in Athens (469 BC - 399 BC) More quotations on: [Life] “The unexamined life is not worth living.”. How does this relate to philosophy? “The unexamined life is not worth living.” (Apology 38a) Socrates would rather die than give up philosophy, and the jury seems happy to grant him that wish. Yourself - The Unexamined Life Is Not Worth Living. Yourself - The Unexamined Life Is Not Worth Living.


The unexamined life is not worth living :the unexamined life is not worth living meaning, the unexamined life is not worth living meaning, the unexamined life is not worth living meaning quote, the unexamined life is not worth living meaning socrates, socrates unexamined life meaning

My blog All of Tumblr

Follow on Tumblr

Is the Unexamined Life Not Worth Living? Essay

Is the Unexamined Life Not Worth Living?
  • Is the Unexamined Life Not Worth Living? Is the unexaminedlife not worthliving . Socrates was a great man, and is said to be.
  • Socrate and the Examined Life significance of the Examined life Adrian Eames 951105878 Section leader: Elizabeth Grosz The Trial and Death of Socrates takes place during a.
  • Meaning of Life and Socrates “The unexaminedLife is not worthliving ” Socrates was considered by many to be the wisest man in.
  • Socrates' Unexamined Life Why does Socrates think that the unexaminedlife is not worthliving . Does he have a good defense of.
Is the Unexamined Life Not Worth Living?

Is the unexamined life not worth living?

When Socrates said, “The life which is unexamined is not worth living”, the philosopher was telling us that we should carefully analyze our actions, a piece of advise for which he should be admired. We should not ignore such a thought-provoking statement about life. The philosopher is telling us that we should carefully analyze our actions. The examination of life is the evaluation of events past and present. By examining our lives, we learn from our mistakes. Although a person who does not examine his life should still continue in existence, examining his actions will make his life much more fulfilling. Without the thorough examination of life, it is almost worthless.
If a person does not examine his life, he may keep making the same mistakes and never change. He would go on in sin and error, not realizing or caring about his mistakes. This would be a tragic mistake, but avoidable if he simply examined his heart and actions for fault, which he would surely find, and pray that he would be able to correct them. Even the best people make mistakes, and the truly great ones recognize and fix them.
The Apostle Peter says that while waiting for the return of Christ, one should “make every effort to be found spotless, blameless and at peace with Him.” The only way a person can do this is to examine itself, and ask the Holy Spirit to reveal his mistakes and help him to fix them. One should definitely do everything he can to obey what Paul says in the Bible, and examining one’s life is a large part of this effort of which Paul speaks. Although perfection is impossible, one can certainly improve itself by merely critiquing his actions for the better.
The examination of one’s life makes it much more enjoyable and pleasing to God. All people will commit sins, so inspection of actions will help in locating flaws. Once found, sins can be corrected. This will avoid many problems that occur because of sin, and will be a good step.

View Full Essay

The Unexamined Life Is Not Worth Living English Literature Essay

Our Guarantees Our Quality Standards Our Fair Use Policy

What Makes UK Essays Different?
  • We have a verifiable trading history as a UK registered company (details at the bottom of every page).
  • Our Nottingham offices are open to the public where you can meet our team of over 40 full-time staff.
  • UK Essays partner with Feefo.com to publish verified customer testimonials - both good and bad!
Ask an Expert FREE

Ask an Expert Index Ask a Question Paid Services

About Our Ask an Expert Service

Our totally free "Ask an Expert" Service allows users to get an answer of up to 300 words to any academic question.

  • Questions typically answered within 24 hours.
  • All answers are researched and written by fully qualified academics in the question's subject area.
  • Our service is completely confidential, only the answer is published - we never publish your personal details.
  • Each professional answer comes with appropriate references.
About Us More About Us The Unexamined Life Is Not Worth Living English Literature Essay

Published: 23, March 2015

The Outsider (1943) is a French philosophical novel which explores various philosophical schools of thought, including (most prominently and specifically) absurdism, as well as determinism, nihilism, and stoicism. A Doll's House (1879), on the other hand, is a Norwegian play, which is often called the first true feminist play. The play is also an important work of the naturalist movement, in which real events and situations are depicted on stage in a departure from previous forms such as romanticism. The protagonists of these works live are shown in the world where they don't belong. Both the works show a conflict between the protagonist and the society. This is because the individual philosophies, interests and beliefs of both of the protagonists clash with those of the society they live in.

"The unexamined life is not worth living", Socrates had said this on his trial for heterodoxy. He used to encourage his students to doubt and challenge the accepted notions of the time, and think for themselves. Socrates was given a choice; he could either accept a sentence of death or stop teaching the students to challenge the beliefs and choose a life in prison. Socrates believed that this alternative would rob him of only thing that made his life useful: examining the world around him and trying to make the society better. For him, it was pointless to live an 'unexamined' life. So he wanted Athens to reward him for his service to society. The result, of course, is that they had no other alternative and were forced to vote for a punishment of death. The maxim's applicability can be verified by extending to the case of Meursault and Nora.

Professional Essay Writers

Get your grade
or your money back
using our Essay Writing Service!

Essay Writing Service

Nora Helmer, the protagonist of the play A Doll's House, lives in a society where woman were to be seen and not heard. She challenges the world breeding women, bearing a sacrificial role in the society. She leaves her husband in contempt. This characterises the political situation of the time when the drama was set, i.e. 1879. The first female "accomplishment" had taken place in 1871, provoked by a growing frustration in the female population. This was the time when women were making their way into the work in large numbers, while women's priorities were not achieving a corresponding impact in the political sphere. Like Socrates, Nora had an alternative which was living with her husband with guilt and shame after 'deceiving' him; but she didn't choose that way because this alternative would rob her of the same thing as Socrates.

On the other hand, the case of Meursault, the protagonist of The Outsider, can only be compared with the determination of Socrates to accept the punishment of death instead of trying to save himself. He displays his honesty, bravery and endurance in the story. But, there is a big difference between Meursault and Socrates of deeds for which they are punished. Meursault is punished for his inhuman behaviour and killing, whereas, Socrates in an attempt for the betterment of his society. He is shown as an apathetic person who laughs on his death sentence and is willing to shoot a man. The novel portrays the pre-independent French-Algerian colonial society, where the inhabitant Arabs had a hatred for the French. Like Socrates, Meursault also challenges the accepted beliefs, but in a very absurd way.

Before the repercussions of the introspection by Nora, she portrays a round-eyed lady who always would think of the good of her family and her husband. She can be considered docile to Torvald (her husband). Initially, Nora is a cheerful, gullible, naive, submissive and childish woman. She is an intelligent housewife, but when it comes to final decisions she is always suppressed. Yet, she happily accepts her life the way it is. Moreover, she emphasises how fantastic her life is when she talks with one of her friends:

"I feel so relieved and so happy, Christine! It will be splendid to have heaps of money and not need to have any anxiety, won't it?"

She always tries to comfort herself by avoiding the realisation of the true nature of her marriage and of the society she's living in.

Comprehensive Writing Services

Plagiarism-free
Always on Time
Marked to Standard

Meursault is a man who completely dwells in a physical world. He is presented as a cold and unfeeling person with regard to his relationship with, and death of, his mother. He may seem to be emotionless to a reader, but he has emotions. But they are not sensuous! He does not show grief or sadness or happiness in many of the circumstances, in which one would observe strong reactions in other ordinary people. All what he thinks about is his physical comfort. The novel starts with the death of Meursault's mother. An emotionless statement opens the novel:

"Mother died today. Or maybe yesterday, I don't know."

This is a bleak statement which bluntly tells how less he cared about his own mother. The statement has an uneasy tone created through Meursault's indifference at the death of his mother. Camus' use of first-person narrative emphasizes the fact that Meausault's indifferent reaction to his mother's death is an honest one and not merely the assessment of an observer. Meursault's mood and tone seem to be calm and normal, even though his mother had died. Camus uses short sentences mirroring the emotionless, uncaring wording in the telegram. Camus uses the narrative structure, for the reader to create and become the consciousness of Meursault. Utah Sate University Professor David Anderson notices that "Meursault takes the stance of simply reporting these impressions, without attempting to create a coherent story from them." Micheline Tisson-Braun comments that Meursault "registers facts, but not their meanings;. is purely instantaneous; he lacks the principle of unity and continuity that characterizes man" (Willenberg)

Nora and Meaursault undergo several events which enlighten them about the absurdity of the world they live in. These events are essential for the reader to understand the reason behind the rebellion of these two characters. Nora realises how the marriage was a 'playtime' for Torvald. Reality begins to revive Nora's senses when Torvald says:

"My dear, I have often seen it in the course of my life as a lawyer. Almost everyone who has gone to the bad early in life has had a deceitful mother."

To which Nora questions:

"Why do you only say- mother?"

When Torvald knows of how Nora had saved his life instead of understand and appreciating her efforts he diminishes her by saying that she is unfit to raise children. Nora finally realises how she had been always oppressed in her own house. She rebels against Torvald saying:

"I mean that I was simply transferred from papa's hands into yours. You arranged everything according to your own taste, and so I got the same tastes as your else I pretended to, I am really not quite sure which-I think sometimes the one and sometimes the other. When I look back on it, it seems to me as if I had been living here like a poor woman-just from hand to mouth. I have existed merely to perform tricks for you, Torvald. But you would have it so.

You and papa have committed a great sin against me. It is your fault that I have made nothing of my life."

Meausault awakens after he is arrested for killing an Arab. When he is sent to prison, he expressed a few bits of realization about his expression of emotions strike his mind. He is gradually sentenced to death as he did not want to lie in the court and follow his advocate's instructions. However, his thinking begins to broaden once he is sentenced to death. The chaplain, who attended his mother's funeral, visits the prison and tries to reform Meursault. But Meursault becomes aggressive towards him and refuses to improve, thinking he is correct. He thinks:

"From the depths of my future, throughout the whole absurd life I'd been leading I'd felt a vague breath drifting towards me across all the years that were still to come, and on its way this breath had evened out everything that was the being proposed to me in the equally unreal years I was living through."

The novel consists of two parts. When moving from the first part to the second a significant change in the language used can be noted. This shows maturation in Meursault's thinking. A frequent use of figurative language can be observed in the second part, for instance:

This Essay is

Explain what Socrates means by claimingThe unexamined life is not worth living Paper by

Explain what Socrates means by claiming `The unexamined life is not worth living.`

The unexamined life is not worth living - Socrates

In to understand what Socrates meant by a life unexamined is not worth living ' it is important to first know what this person. who is considered the wisest man in Ancient Greece meant by examining life Socrates lived in Ancient Greece at a time when it was at the height of its grandeur. During this time. people were busy doing many things and there was great merriment found in the land. However. Socrates became curious about what living life truly meant. To Socrates. life was

a mystery that needed to be understood. He went all over Greece talking to many men about what life meant to them (Kemerling. 2002. He discussed it with those in high offices as well as with the commoners of Greece (Kemerling. 2002. What he found through his questioning was that people valued different things in life (Kemerling. 2002. Some of the men that he asked said that life was about conquering cities and gaining victories in war while others said that life was about experiencing different pleasures such as getting massages at the baths or tasting exquisite delicacies from all over the world. However. Socrates found that these views were very limited and that the people who he interviewed were not able to answer him as to why they wanted to win battles or why they wanted to taste good food. Socrates came to the conclusion that the most important purpose of life is to know what it is for. For him. every person should take time off from doing work and just think about what his or her life means to him or her. Socrates felt that contemplating matters about one 's existence. about why people are in the world and what their purposes for being in the world are. made up a great part of life 's meaning (Kemerling. 2002. The value of examining one 's life is so great that for Socrates. a person who just lives day after day doing work that earns him his keep without thinking about why he wants to live is a person who is throwing his life away. This is why even when he was tried for the things that he preaches and was eventually threatened with being executed if he did not vow to remain silent. he still held on to his philosophy and declared that he would rather die than stop thinking about and talking about the things that he thought of life (Kemerling. 2002

Kemerling. G (2002. Socrates. Philosophical Life. Retrieved May 1 2008 from. http /www .philosophypages .com /hy /2d .htm.

Not the Essay You're looking for? Get a custom essay ( only for $12.99 )

The Unexamined Life essay topics, buy custom The Unexamined Life essay paper sample cheap, service

Custom The Unexamined Life essay paper writing service Buy The Unexamined Life essay paper online

Socrates’ Meaning and its Application on Our Lives

Socrates talked about “unexamined life” during his trial whereby he chose death over other forms of punishment. In reference to our lives and culture, Socrates asserts that people need to have a purpose in life in order to achieve their goals. Thus, this means that people who examine their lives in terms of where they have been and where they are heading. They are happy people because they know how all elements fit in their lives. In addition, Roscoe (2007) says that examining one’s life creates freedom as a person can get to schedule his time.

Truth Behind “Unexamined Life”

It is true that “unexamined life” is not worth living. There are myriad reasons that indicate why unexamined life is not worth living. Firstly, a life that is not examined denies a personal freedom because all the actions that a person will undertake are unplanned for and are better described as spontaneous. Thus, this explains why some people reach an essential time in their lives when they are not prepared for the changes that time avails. Secondly, unexamined life is not worth living because it lacks direction. Soccio (2009) points out that it is essential for people to examine their lives in order to determine where they have gone wrong in the past and avoid the exact mistakes. Thirdly, unexamined life denies a person’s identity; thus, it is not worth living. Examining one’s life enables an individual to decide what he or she wants to become and set a challenge of starting to work towards achieving that goal. Roscoe (2007) indicates that a person that does not examine his or her life lives only for the moment, and such people do not care what they become in the future. This proves that a life which is not examined is not worth living.

Buy The Unexamined Life essay paper online

Related essays